top of page

Retributive vs. Defensive Action

CACN, Spring, 1999

Retributive vs. Defensive Action

From time to time it is good to remind our readers of some important doctrinal distinctions regarding the use of force. As we have clarified repeatedly in myriad interviews, retributive force is the province of the civil authorities who bear the sword Lawfully under the Laws of God; the state is authorized to execute capital criminals and flog derelicts.

But it is the right of the citizen to use defensive force to save the innocent from the attacks of an assailant. Such action can be condemned only if the humanity of the one being protected is denied.

The application is this: We offer no apologetic for the termination of retired abortionists. Such action would not fall under the category of justifiable use of force, educational value notwithstanding.

Recent Posts

See All
On The “Violence” of Religion

All rational people approve the use of force to help an innocent person escape from the danger or threat of death. It is a different situation when the person threatened with death is guilty – by vi

 
 
 
Wars Are Sometimes the Solution for Justice

Lots of people died, But it was worth it. The Civil War provided Freedom for “Negroes”; And it was worth it. Justice is sometimes expensive. Now, what price is worth the protection Of womb-children f

 
 
 
Terrorists and Life Savers

Indeed, depending upon whose “law” you follow and who (or what) your god is, you may find yourself in opposition to fellow citizens. If you honor God (the triune One of the Bible) and follow His law,

 
 
 

Comments


© 2025 by Michael Bray. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page