top of page

On The “Violence” of Religion

All rational people approve the use of force to help an innocent person escape from the danger  or  threat of death.

It is a different situation when the person threatened with death is guilty – by virtue of  his threatening the life of an innocent person.

If an aggressor is threatening an innocent person with imminent death, the aggressor may be “taken out” by any means available.

This guilty one, who is guilty indeed by his threatening posture wherein he displays his intention to murder another, may be “taken out,” indeed, by any means available.

There is nothing “violent” (as in unnecessarily forceful) with such innocent life-saving action.

Such religion is not to be assessed as “violent,” but one which  affirms the just use of force to defend the innocent. 

25 July, 2024

Recent Posts

See All
The Buffoonery of Karl Marx

Karl Marx declared: “The more of himself man attributes to God, the less he has left in himself.” And one might expect such a musing from a zealous anti-Christ: someone who rejects the revelation of G

 
 
 
Supportin’ That Radio

“You know I need your money, honey You know I got to have it right now! Got to pay my bills to give you those thrills Puttin’ music on the radio. I know I talk a little too muchBut for some folks I’m

 
 
 
Where Wisdom and Religion are Joined

Where, then, is wisdom joined with religion? There, indeed, where the one God is worshiped, where life and every action is referred to one source, and to one supreme authority: in short, the teachers

 
 
 

Comments


© 2025 by Michael Bray. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page